I've finally finished my perusal of Lonely Planet's Africa on a Shoestring, which I was using to get an idea of places worth visiting. Actually, I've been done for a while, but I was holding out on posting, hoping Jeff would finish the Asia guidebook and we could also post about that region. Unfortunately, Jeff has been swamped with work as he tries to get everything done in time to graduate with his PhD early next summer, so Asia will have to wait a bit.
Anyhow, on to Africa. While others might think of South Pacific islands, in my mind Africa is the definition of exotic. It's a place so entirely different from my "ordinary." As we've talked about this trip and slowly begun to turn it into reality, Africa has always been my goal, the one place I most wanted to go. I'm pulled to this continent by its stunning natural beauty, its awesome wildlife, and its unique culture. I think I could spend our entire year here, so narrowing places down was hard, and there is still much decision making to do. There will certainly be some wonderful places that end up on the cutting room floor.
So why don't I then begin with the places that we will not be going.
West Africa: Because Africa is such an enormous place, we had to first narrow possible destinations down by location, and when it came to East versus West, East won. The Serengeti, Victoria Falls, and Mt. Kilimanjaro just held too much sway. Perhaps on RTW Take 2, we'll do West Africa.
Countries We've Already Been To: So that's only Egypt. Africa is very much a land of unknowns to us. If Egypt is at all a taste of the continent, we'll both be very happy. I don't think either Jeff or I would have any resistance to going back, but this trip is about the places we haven't been, not the ones, no matter how cool, that we've already experienced.
Unsafe Spots: Yes, life is about taking risks, but not unnecessary ones. So we will be avoiding Sudan, Congo (Zaire), Burundi, Somalia, and Angola.
And now for the exciting part, the countries that interest us. Yes, I know this is way too much, but for this go-round, I was being open to the possibilities, noting everything that captured my imagination.
Rwanda: I can see the radars going off already. For most of us, our defining image of Rwanda is that of the merciless civil war that pitted Hutus against Tutsis and led to what can only be called genocide. However, the country has moved on from the atrocities of 1994, and it is now a safe place to visit. Highlights of Rwanda are the Parc National Nyungwe Forest, where you can see chimpanzees in the wild, and Parc National des Volcans, where you can go on gorilla treks and explore the volcano.
Uganda: Like Rwanda, Uganda has the gorilla thing going on. We'll obviously only go see them once (it's not cheap!), but where, I'm not yet certain. The bad news with the Uganda gorillas is that they live in an area right near the border of Congo and sometimes cross over, which then means you are out of luck, since you can't follow into Congo (and don't really want to). Also, apparently, Uganda is the more popular destination, making it harder to get a spot on a trek. Other cool things in Uganda include Queen Elizabeth National Park--which was wildlife walks and drives and has hippos(!), Ssese Islands--a lovely beach area, and Jinja--the source of the Nile and a hot spot for whitewater rafting.
Tanzania: If there's one country that really has it going on, Tanzania might be it. You've got Serengeti National Park and the Ngorongoro Crater, Mt. Kilimanjaro, and Zanzibar. So crazy wildlife, amazing mountain trekking, and great beaches and scuba diving. There's also the Usambara Mountains, which are known as "Africa's Switzerland," and are great for hiking. What's not to love?
Kenya: Often thought of as the traditional land of the safari, Kenya is home to the Masai Mara, famous for the annual wildebeest migration, and Tsavo National Park. Tsavo just happens to be the name of the lion that resided at the Louisville Zoo when I worked there (and may have been the lion that was thought to have escaped one Halloween although it turned out he was just doing a very good job of hiding). Interesting trivia, huh? Kenya also offers an opportunity to mountain bike at Lake Naivasha and & Hell's Gate National Park. Seriously, a park named Hell's Gate, how can you not want to see that?
Ethiopa: This isn't your mother's Ethiopia, no longer the image associated with the "There's starving children in Africa" ploy to get you to eat your vegetables. These days there is plenty of injera to go around, t hough I can't say that I'm much of a fan of this spongy bread. But I am intrigued by the city of Addis Ababa and it's markets, the ancient sites of Aksum, and the rock churches of Lalibela.
Madagascar: I don't know about you but I associate Madagascar with lemurs, and I think it would be awesome, although potentially deafening, to be in a forest full of lemurs. From my days at the LZ, I can recall the piercing noise just a few of those creatures could make. It was insane. The Parc National de Ranomafana is the place to spot some of these endangered critters. For great hiking and waterfall exploring, there's Parc National de I'Isalo, and for swimming with the whales and sharks (eek), there's the lovely waterfront town of Ifaty. Main problem here is that Madagascar is pretty darn far away from the mainland and not so easy or cheap to access.
Mozambique: Africa with some Latin flavor thanks to its Portuguese colonizers. The diving is good at Bazaruto Archipelago National Park, and the dhow trips around the Querimba Archipelago sound enticing. But I'm not completely sold yet.
Zambia: Sharing Victoria Falls with Zimbabwe, Zambia is an adventure lover's paradise. There's gorge swinging, microlight flights, white water rafting, riverboarding...
Zimbabwe: This country offers up the same Victoria Falls adventures as Zambia, but also has a few other things peaking my interest. The canoe safaris at Mana Pools National Park sound pretty cool and the hiking at Chimanimani sounds top-notch. The issue here though is whether I want, through my tourist dollars, to support the out-of-control President Robert Mugabe.
Botswana: You know those cool National Geographic pictures of rivers just teeming with hippos, so many that it seems you could walk across the water on their backs, that's Botswana, specifically the Okavango Delta. Want to explore that in a dugout canoe? Yeah, me too. Unfortunately, I'm not sure that's going to happen. Botswana is expensive, the land of luxury safaris, and fancy resorts. So most likely, unless we win the lottery prior to this trip, Botswana will be a no-go.
Namibia: German is one of the languages officially spoken here, so I think that means that I better go. It might just be the only place on this trip where I could put my language skills and college degree to work. And it's a happening country, so it's worth a visit with sandboarding in Swakopmund, wildlife watching in Etosha National Park, and red sand dunes exploring in Namib-Naukluft Park. The only trick here is that it's not an easy country to get around, but I think I'm willing to work a little harder for this one.
South Africa: There's lots going on in this popular African destination. Just in Cape Town alone, you can revisit history at Robben Island, get a peek at penguins on Cape Peninsula National Park, and take a hike up Table Mountain. Then you've got the Winelands, the coastal town of Cintsa which is like a summer camp for grownups, the ancient rainforests of Hogsback, and Kruger National Park, where I'm psyched about the exciting and affordable walking safaris.
Wow, that's a lot. Africa just oozes excitement. There are so many unique things to see and do. But if you've actually read through all of my descriptions, you'll have noticed that there is also a fair bit of overlap with the main themes of safaris and adventure sports. Obviously, we're not going to do the same activities over and over while just simply switching countries. We have to narrow things down, figure out what's best, where we can get the most bang for our buck, and what places really capture the authenticity and awesomeness that we're looking for. This isn't the Amazing Race (they've rejected me twice, damn it), so we'd like to actually spend time in the countries we ultimately end up choosing to see, not just breeze through, checking off sites. The planning is underway, but there's still a lot to do.
Showing posts with label Locations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Locations. Show all posts
Thursday, November 1, 2007
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
To-Do #1
So while that list below looks intimidating, there are a lot of things that will be pretty easy to take care of. By far the biggest and most complicated item is #1: Where to go ... and when to go there. I mean, "round the world" is just a little too vague. With that in mind, I'm going to quickly outline how we are trying to figure that out.
To start with, we are in the "information gathering" process right now. This means I have my nose stuck in a guidebook to all of Southeast Asia, and Theresa is buried waist deep in an Africa guidebook. We are finding all of our "can't miss" places, when to go there, how to get there and how long to stay there. None of these things are simple to coordinate ... there are endless combinations and logistical problems. When we finish, we'll trade (and do South America). Then we'll combine notes and do the best we can making the things we *have* to see the loose framework to the trip.
But a lot of the uniqueness of a trip like this happens in the in between times (or so we think), when you're not necessarily on a safari or taking in Angkor Wat. Like meeting locals or fellow travelers with secrets to share, wandering through a local market, or otherwise getting to know a culture beyond the backpacker's hotel. The advice my parents gave me the other night was, "make sure you don't plan too much, leave lots of time for the spontaneous things."
Point taken. I mean, Egypt was an amazing trip at a whirlwind pace, but a lot of the magic of it came from the "non-sites" (and believe me, the sites were astounding): the day we decided that it was just too hot so we drank in the hotel pool all day, singing along with our taxi driver, being told we didn't speak English properly, the foul smelling juice stands that somehow sold miraculously good juice. It's not necessarily what you seek out but what you run into.
Anyway, with that in mind, we want to be careful not to plan too much. This is difficult for us; even on our honeymoon we overbooked. But we want this trip to be about more than just checking sights off our 1000 places to see, we want to delve into cultures and understand the people. Besides, there's no way we could handle our usual traveling pace for an entire year, so this will help us come back still married.
To start with, we are in the "information gathering" process right now. This means I have my nose stuck in a guidebook to all of Southeast Asia, and Theresa is buried waist deep in an Africa guidebook. We are finding all of our "can't miss" places, when to go there, how to get there and how long to stay there. None of these things are simple to coordinate ... there are endless combinations and logistical problems. When we finish, we'll trade (and do South America). Then we'll combine notes and do the best we can making the things we *have* to see the loose framework to the trip.
But a lot of the uniqueness of a trip like this happens in the in between times (or so we think), when you're not necessarily on a safari or taking in Angkor Wat. Like meeting locals or fellow travelers with secrets to share, wandering through a local market, or otherwise getting to know a culture beyond the backpacker's hotel. The advice my parents gave me the other night was, "make sure you don't plan too much, leave lots of time for the spontaneous things."
Point taken. I mean, Egypt was an amazing trip at a whirlwind pace, but a lot of the magic of it came from the "non-sites" (and believe me, the sites were astounding): the day we decided that it was just too hot so we drank in the hotel pool all day, singing along with our taxi driver, being told we didn't speak English properly, the foul smelling juice stands that somehow sold miraculously good juice. It's not necessarily what you seek out but what you run into.
Anyway, with that in mind, we want to be careful not to plan too much. This is difficult for us; even on our honeymoon we overbooked. But we want this trip to be about more than just checking sights off our 1000 places to see, we want to delve into cultures and understand the people. Besides, there's no way we could handle our usual traveling pace for an entire year, so this will help us come back still married.
Thursday, October 4, 2007
The Situation in Burma/Myanmar
Since Jeff and I first decided to take this trip--it's been years in the making now...hurry up with the PhD already--we've been makings lists of places we want to go. We get a zillion travel magazines and we've read through books like "1001 Places to See Before You Die" and "Lonely Planet's A Year of Adventure," searching for locations that seem interesting to us. So far, we haven't settled on anything certain, but we have a pretty good idea.
One of the places on our list was Burma, although it had a faint little question mark next to it. It's a place we'd both like to discover but that we had uncertainties about. As a country led by an oppressive and illegal regime, we wondered what was the right thing to do. For political reasons, should we boycott this country, refusing to contribute money to a corrupt and cruel government? Or should we go in spite of the government, to meet the people, to better understand the situation, to try to put money into the hands of people who need it? We hadn't really formulated an answer.
Recent events have made it such that the decision is not so difficult. Clearly Burma is a troubled and dangerous place--at the moment for travelers, probably always for citizens. And even if it calms down, I am not sure we'd go. I think before, when violence wasn't so blatant, it was somewhat easier to justify a trip there. Now, with my political sensibilities more strongly awakened, it seems that it would be wrong to go against the wishes of democratically-elected leader Aung San Suu Ky, under house arrest since 1990, who asked that people boycott the country until the military regime is deposed and civil liberties are restored. I hope that happens soon, that these protests are not futile, that democracy is indeed on the brink of a comeback. And I hope that not just for my own petty interests, but for the welfare of a people.
What do you think? How much should issues such as these play in to decisions about travel? I'm not exactly sure if I can draw a line in the sand, establish a base criteria. I'm not going to go to somewhere that is clearly dangerous---Iraq for example. But I don't want to not go somewhere because of sensationalized danger that is in fact, not truly there. A fair amount of people thought we were crazy to go to Egypt in 2004, but if I hadn't had gone, I would have missed one of the most amazing and friendly places I have ever been. And what about when a place might not exactly be dangerous but is very strongly anti-American? Although I hear wonderful things about Iran, I'm not planning to go there. However, I think we will go to Venezuela, which is led by a man nearly (or just) as crazy and anti-American as Ahmadinejad. I can't articulate my reasoning, and I can't say that it won't change. Often making decisions about travel has to do a lot more with your gut than your head. It's a rapidly changing world, and sometimes even a line in the sand is a little too permanent.
One of the places on our list was Burma, although it had a faint little question mark next to it. It's a place we'd both like to discover but that we had uncertainties about. As a country led by an oppressive and illegal regime, we wondered what was the right thing to do. For political reasons, should we boycott this country, refusing to contribute money to a corrupt and cruel government? Or should we go in spite of the government, to meet the people, to better understand the situation, to try to put money into the hands of people who need it? We hadn't really formulated an answer.
Recent events have made it such that the decision is not so difficult. Clearly Burma is a troubled and dangerous place--at the moment for travelers, probably always for citizens. And even if it calms down, I am not sure we'd go. I think before, when violence wasn't so blatant, it was somewhat easier to justify a trip there. Now, with my political sensibilities more strongly awakened, it seems that it would be wrong to go against the wishes of democratically-elected leader Aung San Suu Ky, under house arrest since 1990, who asked that people boycott the country until the military regime is deposed and civil liberties are restored. I hope that happens soon, that these protests are not futile, that democracy is indeed on the brink of a comeback. And I hope that not just for my own petty interests, but for the welfare of a people.
What do you think? How much should issues such as these play in to decisions about travel? I'm not exactly sure if I can draw a line in the sand, establish a base criteria. I'm not going to go to somewhere that is clearly dangerous---Iraq for example. But I don't want to not go somewhere because of sensationalized danger that is in fact, not truly there. A fair amount of people thought we were crazy to go to Egypt in 2004, but if I hadn't had gone, I would have missed one of the most amazing and friendly places I have ever been. And what about when a place might not exactly be dangerous but is very strongly anti-American? Although I hear wonderful things about Iran, I'm not planning to go there. However, I think we will go to Venezuela, which is led by a man nearly (or just) as crazy and anti-American as Ahmadinejad. I can't articulate my reasoning, and I can't say that it won't change. Often making decisions about travel has to do a lot more with your gut than your head. It's a rapidly changing world, and sometimes even a line in the sand is a little too permanent.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)